Do the paid-tier arithmetic first
Two percent of your list will pay. Multiply that out before you spend three months building something to sell them.
Twice a month, one issue about writing, designing, and sending a newsletter people finish.

An irreversible action with no undo, pressed while tired, on the thing you care most about. No wonder everyone has a story.
Read this issueTwo percent of your list will pay. Multiply that out before you spend three months building something to sell them.
Every list has a dormant third. Most advice says to win them back. The arithmetic says to let them go, and to do it on purpose.
Email design has one real constraint and about forty imaginary ones. Working inside the real one is where the good work is.
No cadence, no calendar, no apology. She argues that consistency is a promise about quality, not about Tuesdays.
I ran the beautiful HTML version against a near-plain one for four months. The plain one won on every number I cared about.
An audit of a newsletter stack that had quietly grown to 214 euros a month, and what survived it.
It gets opened four times more than anything else you send, and most people write it once, in a hurry, and never look at it again.
Openings get all the advice. The last hundred words are what decides whether anyone replies, forwards, or opens the next one.
No, the word 'free' does not send you to spam. Here is what actually decides whether your issue lands, in the order it matters.
Writing the thing: openings, endings, voice, and what to cut before you send.
How an issue looks in an inbox and on the web, and why the two rarely match.
Finding readers and keeping them, without buying a list or begging for shares.
Paid tiers, sponsorship, and what the whole thing costs to keep running.
Sending software, deliverability, analytics, and what is worth paying for.
Conversations with people who have been publishing long enough to have opinions.